By Scott Wilson
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday,
June 27, 2004; Page A20
KARBALA, Iraq -- During more than a year in Iraq, Sgt. David Taylor saw
perhaps as many Iraqis through the primary sight of his M1 Abrams tank as he did
face to face. But who exactly he saw still baffles him. The salty tank commander from the 1st Armored Division worked on the edge of
Baghdad's desperately poor Sadr City for much of the past year. Then, in late
April, he was rushed to this city 60 miles southwest of Baghdad to help put down
an armed uprising in what developed into the most difficult fighting of his time
here. One day a few months ago, his men hauled tons of topsoil into the Baghdad
slum to refurbish a rundown soccer field, a children's project in the midst of a
grown-up war, and something well outside a tank commander's job description.
When they returned the next morning to finish the task, the soil had
disappeared. "They stole dirt, their own dirt," said Taylor, 37, a Persian Gulf War
veteran from Copperas Cove, Tex. Shaking his head and staring into his lunch at
a post cafeteria here, he added, "I still haven't figured them out." Throughout the 15-month U.S. occupation of Iraq, soldiers from the 1st
Armored Division worked to pacify a country recovering from decades of
dictatorship and a traumatic invasion. Just as relentlessly, the war worked on
them. They faced a shifting insurgency that culminated in a 60-day fight for the
Shiite Muslim south as intense as any since the war began. And over their 15
months, during which 97 division soldiers died in combat and more than 1,000
were wounded, they struggled to clarify their perception of the everyday Iraqis
they believed they had come to help. Their time here has left many soldiers, from veteran tank drivers to young
company commanders, with a confused picture of the Iraqis who never took up arms
against them. Many share tales of intimate kindnesses by individual Iraqis. But
they also acknowledge that the tactics they used against an elusive insurgency,
while killing many enemy fighters, created new adversaries among civilians
caught in the crossfire. The soldiers express uneasiness about the country's course as they prepare to
depart after the June 30 handover of limited authority to an Iraqi government.
It will be charted, say many street-level soldiers, by ordinary Iraqis who often
appeared less determined to influence the country's future than did the
insurgents who mingled among them. "Not to be cynical about it, but we just don't know whether to trust them,"
said Lt. Tim Hogan, a 25-year-old military police officer from Dubuque,
Iowa. In late April 2003, the division arrived in Baghdad to carry out a "stability
operation" in the aftermath of a swift war. In the first few weeks there was
some shooting, mostly in neighborhoods sympathetic to the collapsed government.
Soon, nation-building duties, such as Taylor's soccer stadium, consumed the
soldiers. If the Iraqis were not entirely friendly partners, they were not
overtly hostile, either. But just as the everyday frustrations of military checkpoints, road closures
and arrests wore down the Iraqis, roadside bombs afflicted the soldiers. Capt.
Jon Dunn, 31, a company commander from Woodbridge, Va., ran into five during his
time in Baghdad and became known as the "metal detector" among his soldiers. As
a new year began, the battlefield was treacherous. But the insurgency had yet to
fully show itself. "Until April, it was unthinkable to come after coalition forces with an RPG,"
said Capt. Ty Wilson, 31, a company commander from Fairfax, Va. "Then suddenly
they were everywhere." The uprising overwhelmed perceptions formed over the previous year of
nation-building, leaving the trauma of combat to define the soldiers'
understanding of the Iraqis. After weeks of fighting under cover of darkness, Lt. Jon Silk found himself
in a running gun battle lit by daylight. In late May, Silk's platoon pushed into
Kufa, a stronghold of the anti-American militia led by the young cleric Moqtada
Sadr. The troops' mission was to test a truce declared a few days earlier, using
themselves as targets. The blazing rooftop ambushes that greeted his men were an unequivocal sign
that the cease-fire had not taken hold. Searching for a way to get above the
fire, Silk and his men charged into a private home, apologized briefly to the
flustered owners, and headed to the roof to set up gun positions. "I thought they'd be angry, upset," said Silk, an amiable 35-year-old from
Boston who had spent his career in the enlisted ranks until commissioned before
the war. "The next thing I know, they're serving us food and tea while we were
fighting." In the streets below Silk's position, the battle worsened. He and his men
left the surprising hospitality and joined the fight, at times engaging
insurgents in hand-to-hand combat. But Silk was also receiving a shocking new
daylight perspective on the kind of combat that had been hidden in darkness for
weeks. "When we returned to camp that afternoon, me and my gunners were all
shaking," Silk said. "It was the first time we'd ever seen what our guns were
doing to them." Capt. Geoff Wright, who commands a tank company, was in the fight with Silk
that day in Kufa. And he, too, was taken aback after seeing the faces of his
enemy, much younger than he had imagined, up close. To Wright, known for his wry sense of humor, the daylight fighting also
clarified in a disappointing way the halting progress the Americans had made
with Iraqis during the occupation. In this case, it seemed to Wright, the Shiite Muslim majority that had
largely welcomed the U.S. invasion after suffering under ousted president Saddam
Hussein's Sunni-led government had turned. "It was interesting to think about," said Wright, 31, of Emmaus, Pa. "These
were the same people that all year you have been trying to cultivate, and now
they are either sitting on the fence and quietly hoping you succeed or working
against you." Many division soldiers suggested that the tactics employed by the insurgency
shaped, unfairly or not, their view of Iraqis who were not technically part of
it. The distinction was often a challenging one to make on the urban
battlefields they encountered. Soldiers were attacked during the spring campaign in the south from the roofs
of hospitals and the classrooms of schools. Mosques became weapons stockpiles
and staging areas for ambushes. Snipers hid in the tops of date palm trees. "They had good ideas about where they wanted us to fight," said Staff Sgt.
Robert McBride, 35, from Roscoe, Tex., and a veteran of the Persian Gulf
War. But rarely, particularly as the uprising developed, did Iraqi civilians step
forward with information to save soldiers from an ambush or point out a weapons
depot. Part of the reason for that was fear, soldiers said they believed, but
also a reluctance to take sides. After weeks of intense fighting near Kufa's Salah mosque, Capt. John Moore, a
tank company commander, said people emerged from their homes to greet the
soldiers. No help had been forthcoming in the previous weeks, but to Moore it
appeared that a new popularity flowed from their apparent victory. "Maybe they were just happy we weren't shooting off heavy weaponry in their
neighborhood anymore," said Moore, 33, of Chesapeake, Va. "But it also seemed
like they were happy the SOBs were gone." For most of the division's three-month extension, Col. Rob Baker's 2nd
Brigade Combat Team was responsible for a stretch of towns south of Baghdad that
are among the most hostile to the occupation. Over that time, 12 of his soldiers
were killed, more than twice the number who died over the previous year. Foreigners are routinely attacked along the road through Mahmudiyah and
Latifiyah, where disaffected Sunni tribes once loyal to Hussein, as well as
foreign militants and Shiite rebels, have taken refuge. U.S. troops face
ambushes and roadside bombs. To Baker, building an intelligence network among the different groups --
sometimes working in concert and other times at odds -- has been a revealing
challenge. He has given his informants cameras, GPS equipment and espionage
training. "In some cases, they do it out of patriotism," Baker said of the few Iraqis
who have worked with him. "Others we put on the payroll." Community outreach efforts by Baker and his men have been tailored to local
sensibilities. In addition to spending $13.5 million on development projects
since mid-April, Baker has adopted new, softer rules in dealing with a mostly
suspicious community. He ordered soldiers not to place bags over the heads of detained Iraqis and
whenever possible to arrest suspected insurgents outside the view of their
wives. Baker also wrote a letter of apology to every detainee wrongly arrested,
handed to them upon release. "Even if one of the people in a house killed one of our soldiers, we'd be
back to fix the door we broke down in arresting him the next day," said Baker,
44, of Aberdeen, Md., who bears a passing resemblance to his high-school
classmate, former Baltimore Orioles star Cal Ripken Jr. The outreach, Baker contends, has had some success. His men are defusing more
roadside bombs than are exploding, and in recent weeks they have captured a
number of important local leaders of the insurgency. But the nature of the
resistance often means that new enemies are made as fast as friends. After a car bomb exploded in Yusifiyah in May, killing eight soldiers, Baker
ordered a sweep through the neighborhood. His soldiers searched more than 700
houses over the next 12 hours, leaving, in his words, "a lot of disgruntled
citizens." "We have a big challenge to improve our image," Baker said. "What we are
trying to instill in Iraqis is trust and confidence. But it doesn't mean we will
win their friendship."